From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Waukesha v. Boehnen

STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II
Apr 29, 2015
865 N.W.2d 885 (Wis. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. 2014AP1386.

2015-04-29

CITY OF WAUKESHA, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Robert J. BOEHNEN, Defendant–Appellant.

Id., ¶ 18 (citation omitted). Boehnen clearly has failed to show us why he and other bar owners are singled out for prosecution while others similarly situated are not. The bartenders are not similarly situated. They work for the bar owners. The ultimate responsibility to make sure that the law is being followed must rest with the owners—they make the rules, hire and fire, and set bar policy. Boehnen has not established a prima facie case of selective prosecution. We affirm.



Summaries of

City of Waukesha v. Boehnen

STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II
Apr 29, 2015
865 N.W.2d 885 (Wis. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

City of Waukesha v. Boehnen

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF WAUKESHA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROBERT J. BOEHNEN…

Court:STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II

Date published: Apr 29, 2015

Citations

865 N.W.2d 885 (Wis. Ct. App. 2015)
362 Wis. 2d 540
2015 WI App. 43