From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Poughkeepsie v. Black

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 11, 1987
130 A.D.2d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

May 11, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.).


Ordered that the motion is granted, and the cross motion is denied.

The documents contained in the appendix to the appellant's reply brief were not before the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, and are thus not a proper part of the record on appeal (see, CPLR 5526; Van Dussen-Storto Motor Inn v. Rochester Tel. Corp., 63 A.D.2d 244, 251). Further, this court declines to exercise its discretion to take judicial notice of the materials in the appendix to the appellant's reply brief (see, Richardson, Evidence § 14, at 9 [Prince 10th ed]; Fisch, New York Evidence § 1048, at 591). The documents contained in this appendix were available to the appellant, but were not included in the papers submitted to the court of first instance because of the lack of relevancy, given the appellant's concession that the 112 Academy Street premises had been sold by the respondent prior to entry of the default judgment, and that the default judgment consequently did not include penalties for the respondent's failure to correct violations at that premises. Bracken, J.P., Brown, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

City of Poughkeepsie v. Black

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 11, 1987
130 A.D.2d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

City of Poughkeepsie v. Black

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF POUGHKEEPSIE, Appellant, v. MICHAEL C. BLACK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 11, 1987

Citations

130 A.D.2d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Colavito v. N.Y. State Comptroller

Here, petitioner alleged that she was not notified when the death benefits were paid out to the…