Submitted December 6, 1907
Decided December 20, 1907
William Allan Hoar for appellant.
Francis K. Pendleton, Corporation Counsel ( Theodore Connoly and George O'Reilly of counsel), for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., O'BRIEN, EDWARD T. BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN, HISCOCK and CHASE, JJ.
Full title:THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v . JOHN WATTS DE PEYSTER et al.…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Dec 20, 1907
On the other hand, no such presumption of consent arises from the existence for any length of time of a…
Matter of Green v. MillerCellar ways may be allowed by the city ( Jorgensen v. Squires, supra). So may iron platforms ( Murphy v.…