From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Huntington Woods & City of Pleasant Ridge v. City of Oak Park

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Feb 3, 2016
499 Mich. 860 (Mich. 2016)

Opinion

Docket No. 152035. COA No. 321414.

02-03-2016

CITY OF HUNTINGTON WOODS and City of Pleasant Ridge, Plaintiffs/Counter–Defendants–Appellants, v. CITY OF OAK PARK, Defendant/Counter–Plaintiff–Appellee, and 45th District Court, Defendant/Appellee.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 11, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing: (1) whether in the absence of an agreement for joint funding of a district court in districts of the third class where the court sits in only one political subdivision, all district funding units within the district have an independent obligation to fund the court; (2) whether the parties in this case agreed that the 45th District Court would be funded entirely by the City of Oak Park; and (3) whether revenue from fees collected for building operations and retiree benefits is subject to revenue sharing under MCL 600.8379(l )(c). The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.


Summaries of

City of Huntington Woods & City of Pleasant Ridge v. City of Oak Park

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Feb 3, 2016
499 Mich. 860 (Mich. 2016)
Case details for

City of Huntington Woods & City of Pleasant Ridge v. City of Oak Park

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF HUNTINGTON WOODS and City of Pleasant Ridge…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Feb 3, 2016

Citations

499 Mich. 860 (Mich. 2016)
873 N.W.2d 779