Opinion
SC: 152035
02-03-2016
CITY OF HUNTINGTON WOODS and CITY OF PLEASANT RIDGE, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants-Appellants, v. CITY OF OAK PARK, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff-Appellee, and 45TH DISTRICT COURT, Defendant/Appellee.
Order
Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices COA: 321414
Oakland CC: 2013-135842-CZ
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 11, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing: (1) whether in the absence of an agreement for joint funding of a district court in districts of the third class where the court sits in only one political subdivision, all district funding units within the district have an independent obligation to fund the court; (2) whether the parties in this case agreed that the 45th District Court would be funded entirely by the City of Oak Park; and (3) whether revenue from fees collected for building operations and retiree benefits is subject to revenue sharing under MCL 600.8379(1)(c). The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
February 3, 2016
/s/_________
Clerk