Opinion
November, 1916.
Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs, with usual leave to defendant to withdraw demurrer, and answer on payment of costs in this court and in the court below. All concurred, except Howard, J., who dissented.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
City of Hudson v. Burchartz Fireproofing Co., Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1916
175 App. Div. 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Summaries of
City of Hudson v. Burchartz Fireproofing Co., Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1916
175 App. Div. 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for
City of Hudson v. Burchartz Fireproofing Co., Inc.
Case Details
Full title:THE CITY OF HUDSON and BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF HUDSON…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Date published: Nov 1, 1916
Citations
175 App. Div. 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)