From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Hialeah v. Crespo

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 9, 2001
786 So. 2d 42 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. 3D00-0821.

Opinion filed May 9, 2001.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ronald M. Friedman, Judge. Lower Tribunal No. 92-25428.

Walton Lantaff Schroeder Carson, and Robert L. Teitler, for appellant.

S. Austin Carr, for appellees.

Before GERSTEN, GODERICH, and SHEVIN, JJ.


We affirm the trial court's order granting appellee, Andrea Crespo, a new trial to determine liability on the cause of action for negligent retention in her consortium claim. Because the new evidence only concerns liability, the trial court correctly determined that the previously determined damages need not be retried. See Griefer v. DiPietro, 625 So.2d 1226 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).

We are confident that the trial court's comments regarding a predetermined course of action during a new trial were purely unintentional. The trial court will most assuredly keep an open mind throughout the new trial.

The appellee has timely filed a motion for appellate legal fees. This court grants the motion contingent upon the appellee prevailing below, leaving the determination of the amount to the trial court, as is authorized by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400(b). Accordingly, we remand the assessment of appellate attorney's fees to the trial court to determine upon conclusion of the trial below.

Affirmed and remanded.


Summaries of

City of Hialeah v. Crespo

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 9, 2001
786 So. 2d 42 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

City of Hialeah v. Crespo

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF HIALEAH, a Florida Municipal Corporation, Appellant, v. HENRY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 9, 2001

Citations

786 So. 2d 42 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)