From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Goodlettsville v. Priceline.com, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jan 23, 2012
Civil No. 3:08-0561 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 23, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 3:08-0561

01-23-2012

THE CITY OF GOODLETTSVILLE, TENNESSEE and THE CITY OF BRENTWOOD, TENNESSEE, on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated taxing authorities with the State of Tennessee, Plaintiffs, v. PRICELINE.COM, INC., et al., Defendants.


Judge Trauger

ORDER

The Motion For Extension of Trial Schedule (Docket No. 374) is GRANTED. The parties have anticipated that this case will be resolved on summary judgment. The court does not anticipate that the summary judgment motions will be decided sufficiently in advance of when the parties would have to be expending time on preparation of pretrial filings. Moreover, this court is beginning the trial of a two-month criminal case on February 14, 2012 that, in all events, will interfere with the trial date in this case.

The Order Resetting Jury Trial (Docket No. 281) is hereby VACATED. A new trial date will be established, if necessary, after a decision on the pending summary judgment motions.

It is so ORDERED.

_______________

ALETA A. TRAUGER

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

City of Goodlettsville v. Priceline.com, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jan 23, 2012
Civil No. 3:08-0561 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 23, 2012)
Case details for

City of Goodlettsville v. Priceline.com, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:THE CITY OF GOODLETTSVILLE, TENNESSEE and THE CITY OF BRENTWOOD…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jan 23, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 3:08-0561 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 23, 2012)