From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Columbus v. Sunstar Columbus, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Oct 23, 2015
Case No. 2:15-cv-1864 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 23, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 2:15-cv-1864

10-23-2015

CITY OF COLUMBUS, OHIO, Plaintiff, v. SUNSTAR COLUMBUS, INC., et al., Defendants.



Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp
OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate Judge's October 2, 2015 Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 13.) The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court grant in part and deny in part Plaintiff's motion to remand so that the Court would remand this action to state court and deny an award of attorneys' fees. The Report and Recommendation advised the parties that a failure to file a timely objection would waive the right to de novo review by the undersigned and the right to appeal a decision adopting the Report and Recommendation. Because no objections have been filed, the time for filing objections has expired, and the Magistrate Judge's reasoning is correct, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 13) and GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion to remand (ECF No. 9). The case is remanded to the Franklin County Municipal Court, Environmental Division, and the request for an award of attorneys' fees is not well taken.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Gregory L. Frost

GREGORY L. FROST

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

City of Columbus v. Sunstar Columbus, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Oct 23, 2015
Case No. 2:15-cv-1864 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 23, 2015)
Case details for

City of Columbus v. Sunstar Columbus, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF COLUMBUS, OHIO, Plaintiff, v. SUNSTAR COLUMBUS, INC., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 23, 2015

Citations

Case No. 2:15-cv-1864 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 23, 2015)