From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Columbia v. Bolton

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Feb 8, 2012
2012-UP-065 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 8, 2012)

Opinion

2012-UP-065

02-08-2012

City of Columbia, Respondent, v. Luella Bolton, Appellant.

Luella Bolton, pro se, of Hopkins. Constance D. Holloway, of Columbia, for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted January 3, 2012.

Appeal From Richland County C. Tolbert Goolsby, Jr., Acting Circuit Court Judge.

Luella Bolton, pro se, of Hopkins.

Constance D. Holloway, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Luella Bolton appeals the order of the circuit court affirming her appeal from the municipal court. She argues the circuit court erred in finding evidence supported her conviction for failing to have an infant in a child passenger restraint seat. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: City of Rock Hill v. Suchenski, 374 S.C. 12, 15, 646 S.E.2d 879, 880 (2007) ("In criminal appeals from municipal court, the circuit court does not conduct a de novo review.... [An] appellate court reviews errors of law only." (citations omitted)).

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

AFFIRMED.

HUFF, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

City of Columbia v. Bolton

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Feb 8, 2012
2012-UP-065 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 8, 2012)
Case details for

City of Columbia v. Bolton

Case Details

Full title:City of Columbia, Respondent, v. Luella Bolton, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Feb 8, 2012

Citations

2012-UP-065 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 8, 2012)