Opinion
Gen. No. 42,683. (Abstract of Decision.)
Opinion filed December 13, 1943
APPEAL AND ERROR, § 64 — dismissal of piecemeal appeal. Where defendants were found guilty by municipal court of violating two separate provisions of municipal code and fine was imposed, and subsequently there was entered order which vacated finding of guilty and judgment as to first of provisions and overruled motion to vacate finding and judgment as to second provision and which thus left undisposed of part of case relating to first provision, held that appeal to Appellate Court from judgment of conviction and from order, denying defendants' motion to vacate such judgment as to second provision and for new trial, would be dismissed, since cases would not be reviewed piece. meal, and that only when whole case was finally disposed of would matter be reviewed.
See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.
Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. SAMUEL E. HELLER, Judge, presiding.
Appeal dismissed. Heard in the first division, first district, this court at the June term, 1943.
William Henning Rubin, for appellants;
Barnet Hodes, Corporation Counsel, for appellee;
J. Herzl Segal, Assistant Corporation Counsel, of counsel.
Not to be published in full. Opinion filed December 13, 1943.