Opinion
Gen. No. 44,414. (Abstract of Decision.)
Opinion filed May 10, 1949 Released for publication June 3, 1949
SAVING QUESTIONS for REVIEW, § 8 — validity of ordinances. Validity of ordinances prescribing type of materials to be used in buildings constructed in fire limits could not be challenged by defendant on appeal from judgment finding defendant guilty of violating ordinances, where defendant filed no pleadings or motion to strike complaint on ground that ordinances were invalid and did not object to their validity when they were offered in evidence.
See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.
Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hen. CECIL C. SMITH, Judge, presiding.
Judgment affirmed. Heard in the second division, first district, this court at the April term, 1948.
Milton T. Raynor, for appellant;
Alphonse Cerza, of counsel;
Benjamin S. Adamowski, Corporation Counsel, for appellee;
L. Louis Karton, Head of Appeals and Review Division, and Harry H. Pollack, Assistant Corporation Counsel, of counsel.
Not to be published in fun. Opinion filed May 10, 1949; released for publication June 3, 1949.