From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Chicago, v. Bernstein

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
May 10, 1949
337 Ill. App. 649 (Ill. App. Ct. 1949)

Opinion

Gen. No. 44,414. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed May 10, 1949 Released for publication June 3, 1949

SAVING QUESTIONS for REVIEW, § 8validity of ordinances. Validity of ordinances prescribing type of materials to be used in buildings constructed in fire limits could not be challenged by defendant on appeal from judgment finding defendant guilty of violating ordinances, where defendant filed no pleadings or motion to strike complaint on ground that ordinances were invalid and did not object to their validity when they were offered in evidence.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hen. CECIL C. SMITH, Judge, presiding.

Judgment affirmed. Heard in the second division, first district, this court at the April term, 1948.

Milton T. Raynor, for appellant;

Alphonse Cerza, of counsel;

Benjamin S. Adamowski, Corporation Counsel, for appellee;

L. Louis Karton, Head of Appeals and Review Division, and Harry H. Pollack, Assistant Corporation Counsel, of counsel.


Not to be published in fun. Opinion filed May 10, 1949; released for publication June 3, 1949.


Summaries of

City of Chicago, v. Bernstein

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
May 10, 1949
337 Ill. App. 649 (Ill. App. Ct. 1949)
Case details for

City of Chicago, v. Bernstein

Case Details

Full title:City of Chicago, Appellee, v. Melvin Bernstein, Appellant

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: May 10, 1949

Citations

337 Ill. App. 649 (Ill. App. Ct. 1949)
86 N.E.2d 286

Citing Cases

Davis v. Davis

Under the general rule, it is the duty of a person, whenever he regards his constitutional rights as invaded,…

City of Des Plaines v. Gacs

• 7 The doctrine of laches, however, has no application to the enforcement by a municipality of its…