From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Bismarck v. Pederson

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Oct 4, 2016
2016 N.D. 191 (N.D. 2016)

Opinion

No. 20160021

10-04-2016

City of Bismarck, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Tiffany Pederson, Defendant and Appellant

Jason J. Hammes, City Prosecutor, P.O. Box 5503, Bismarck, ND 58506-5503, for plaintiff and appellee. Dan L. Herbel, The Regency Business Center, 3333 East Broadway Avenue, Suite 1205, Bismarck, ND 58501, for defendant and appellant.


Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable James S. Hill, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Jason J. Hammes, City Prosecutor, P.O. Box 5503, Bismarck, ND 58506-5503, for plaintiff and appellee.

Dan L. Herbel, The Regency Business Center, 3333 East Broadway Avenue, Suite 1205, Bismarck, ND 58501, for defendant and appellant.

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Tiffany Pederson appealed from a criminal judgment for actual physical control of a motor vehicle while under the influence entered upon a conditional guilty plea after the district court denied her motion to suppress. On appeal, Pederson argues the district court erred in denying her motion to suppress, contending the initial contact made by the officer constituted an illegal seizure. We conclude the district court's decision is not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2]

Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom


Summaries of

City of Bismarck v. Pederson

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Oct 4, 2016
2016 N.D. 191 (N.D. 2016)
Case details for

City of Bismarck v. Pederson

Case Details

Full title:City of Bismarck, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Tiffany Pederson, Defendant…

Court:SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

Date published: Oct 4, 2016

Citations

2016 N.D. 191 (N.D. 2016)