From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Beaufort v. Tocharoen

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jun 12, 2013
Appellate Case No. 2012-211429 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 12, 2013)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2012-211429 Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-246

06-12-2013

City of Beaufort, Respondent, v. Dechpong Tocharoen, Appellant.

Eric J. Erickson, of Erickson Law Firm, LLC, of Beaufort, for Appellant. William B. Harvey, III, of Harvey & Battey, PA, of Beaufort, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.


Appeal From Beaufort County

Marvin H. Dukes, III, Special Circuit Court Judge


AFFIRMED

Eric J. Erickson, of Erickson Law Firm, LLC, of Beaufort, for Appellant.

William B. Harvey, III, of Harvey & Battey, PA, of Beaufort, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dechpong Tocharoen appeals his conviction of Driving Under the Influence (DUI), arguing the trial court erred in admitting his breathalyzer test results. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: 1. As to admission of breathalyzer test: State v. Curtis, 356 S.C. 622, 632, 591 S.E.2d 600, 605 (2004) ("A party cannot complain of an error which his own conduct created."). 2. As to refusal of first breathalyzer test: State v. Goodwin, 384 S.C. 588, 603, 683 S.E.2d 500, 508 (Ct. App. 2009) ("In order for an issue to be preserved for appellate review, it must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial court.").

AFFIRMED.

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

City of Beaufort v. Tocharoen

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jun 12, 2013
Appellate Case No. 2012-211429 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 12, 2013)
Case details for

City of Beaufort v. Tocharoen

Case Details

Full title:City of Beaufort, Respondent, v. Dechpong Tocharoen, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 12, 2013

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2012-211429 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 12, 2013)