From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Albany v. Yaras

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 16, 1959
6 N.Y.2d 749 (N.Y. 1959)

Opinion

Argued January 5, 1959

Decided April 16, 1959

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, MARTIN SCHENCK, J.

John W. Hacker, Corporation Counsel, for appellant.

C. Dickerman Williams and Coplin Yaras, in person, for Coplin Yaras, respondent.


Order reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, in the following Per Curiam: We hold that the order was appealable to the Appellate Division. Upon this record, the County Judge and the Commissioners of Appraisal may not be removed. (Judiciary Law, § 14; Matter of Hancock, 91 N.Y. 284, 292-293; Matter of Dodge Stevenson Mfg. Co., 77 N.Y. 101; Matter of Rotwein [ Goodman], 291 N.Y. 116, 123; County of Orange v. Storm King Stone Co., 229 N.Y. 460, 467.) The three questions certified [(a), (b) and (c)] are answered as follows: (a) in the affirmative; (b) in the negative; (c) not answered. Motion to strike material from respondent's brief granted to the extent of striking therefrom the material contained at pages 61 to 70; motion otherwise denied.

Concur: Chief Judge CONWAY and Judges DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE.


Summaries of

City of Albany v. Yaras

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 16, 1959
6 N.Y.2d 749 (N.Y. 1959)
Case details for

City of Albany v. Yaras

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF ALBANY, Appellant, v. COPLIN YARAS, Respondent, et al., Defendants

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 16, 1959

Citations

6 N.Y.2d 749 (N.Y. 1959)

Citing Cases

Mesholam v. Mesholam

onstruction of marital property championed by this Court, which should cause this Court to reverse the…

Great Neck Auth. v. Citizens Water Co.

Company argues that the Appellate Division committed error in dismissing Company's appeal from the striking…