Opinion
May 5, 1944.
Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County.
Orders affirmed, each with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.
Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ., concur; Martin, P.J., dissents in opinion.
Objections to an account should plainly and concisely indicate the transactions complained of so that the accountant may be informed of the charges he is required to meet. The objections here do not meet that test. Until the issues are defined, the estate should not be burdened with the expense of a reference which in effect is a roving investigation.
The orders appealed from should be reversed, with leave to respondent to file amended objections.