From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Citizens v. Sec. of State

Michigan Court of Appeals
Aug 20, 2008
280 Mich. App. 801 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008)

Summary

listing the proposed changes

Summary of this case from Citizens Protecting Mich.'s Constitution v. Sec'y of State

Opinion

Docket No. 286734.

August 20, 2008.


Order Entered August 20, 2008:

The Court orders that the relief sought in the complaint for a writ of mandamus is granted. Michigan United Conservation Clubs v Secretary of State (After Remand), 464 Mich 359, 365-366 (2001). Reform Michigan Government Now! (RMGN) has submitted its proposal under the initiative petition procedure that Const 1963, art 12, §§ 2, establishes for amending the constitution. However, the proposal is a "general revision" of the constitution that can be accomplished only under Const 1963, art 12, §§ 3. Therefore, the constitutional power of initiative does not extend to the proposal. Consequently, the RMGN initiative petition does not meet the constitutional prerequisites for acceptance. As a result, the Secretary of State and the Board of State Canvassers are ordered and directed to stop the canvas, to reject the RMGN initiative petition, and to not allow the proposal to be placed on the ballot. Leininger v Secretary of State, 316 Mich 644 (1947); City of Jackson v Comm'r of Revenue, 316 Mich 694 (1947), citing Leininger, supra; see Michigan United Conservation Clubs, supra. See also MCR 7.2 16(A)(7).

The motion for stay is denied. This order shall be effective immediately. We retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Citizens v. Sec. of State

Michigan Court of Appeals
Aug 20, 2008
280 Mich. App. 801 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008)

listing the proposed changes

Summary of this case from Citizens Protecting Mich.'s Constitution v. Sec'y of State

discussing ripeness

Summary of this case from Prose v. Prose

stating that " claim is not ripe if it rests upon contingent future events that may not occur as anticipated, or may not occur at all"

Summary of this case from Haring Charter Twp. v. Cadillac
Case details for

Citizens v. Sec. of State

Case Details

Full title:CITIZENS PROTECTING MICHIGAN'S CONSTITUTION, LOWELL R. ULRICH, MICHAEL…

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 20, 2008

Citations

280 Mich. App. 801 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008)
761 N.W.2d 210

Citing Cases

Citizens Protecting Mich.'s Constitution v. Sec'y of State

However, this Court is obliged to make the threshold determination of whether an initiative petition meets…

Protect MI Constitution v. Secretary of State

“Mandamus is the appropriate remedy for a party seeking to compel action by election officials.” Id. at 283,…