From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Citibank (South Dakota) N.A. v. Lowenbein

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Aug 20, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 81981 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

Motion No: 2012-00414 Index No. 26628/10M142454

08-20-2012

Citibank (South Dakota) N.A., plaintiff, v. Shmuel A. Lowenbein, appellant.


, J.P.

CHERYL E. CHAMBERS

L. PRISCILLA HALL

PLUMMER E. LOTT

ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 23, 2011. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated July 10, 2012, the appellant was directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal on the ground that the appellant was not aggrieved by the order dated March 23, 2011,

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the issue the appellant seeks to raise on the appeal remains pending and undecided (see CPLR 5511; Katz v Katz, 68 AD2d 536); and it is further,

ORDERED that the application is denied as academic.

DICKERSON, J.P., CHAMBERS, HALL, LOTT and MILLER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

Citibank (South Dakota) N.A. v. Lowenbein

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Aug 20, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 81981 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Citibank (South Dakota) N.A. v. Lowenbein

Case Details

Full title:Citibank (South Dakota) N.A., plaintiff, v. Shmuel A. Lowenbein, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

Date published: Aug 20, 2012

Citations

2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 81981 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)