From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Citibank, N.A. v. Swiatkowski

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 8, 2012
98 A.D.3d 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-08-8

CITIBANK, N.A., respondent, v. Michael SWIATKOWSKI, defendant, Lidia Swiatkowski, appellant.

Lidia Swiatkowski, Massapequa, N.Y., appellant pro se. Katz & Rychik, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Bennett R. Katz of counsel), for respondent.


Lidia Swiatkowski, Massapequa, N.Y., appellant pro se. Katz & Rychik, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Bennett R. Katz of counsel), for respondent.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Lidia Swiatkowski appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Jonas, J.), dated November 10, 2004, as denied those branches of the defendants' motion which were pursuant to CPLR 5015(a) to vacate a judgment entered June 14, 1999, in a prior action, and pursuant to CPLR 3211(a) to dismiss the complaint in this action.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the judgment in this action on October 13, 2005 ( see Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248, 383 N.Y.S.2d 285, 347 N.E.2d 647), and, by decision and order on motion of this Court dated July 17, 2006, the appeal from that judgment was dismissed as abandoned for the appellant's failure to perfect the appeal.

FLORIO, J.P., BALKIN, CHAMBERS and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Citibank, N.A. v. Swiatkowski

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 8, 2012
98 A.D.3d 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Citibank, N.A. v. Swiatkowski

Case Details

Full title:CITIBANK, N.A., respondent, v. Michael SWIATKOWSKI, defendant, Lidia…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 8, 2012

Citations

98 A.D.3d 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
949 N.Y.S.2d 634
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 5904

Citing Cases

U.S. Bank Nat'Lass'N v. Maniscalco

ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appeals are dismissed, with one bill…

Malul v. Azulay

Thus, counsel states that there are questions of fact as to whether the transaction was at arms length,…