From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cisneros v. Metro Transit Auth.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Dec 3, 2012
No. 3:11-cv-0896 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 3, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:11-cv-0896

12-03-2012

MARTIN CISNEROS, Plaintiff, v. METRO TRANSIT AUTHORITY (MTA) et al., Defendants.


Chief Judge Haynes


ORDER

Upon de novo review of the Report and Recommendation and consideration of Plaintiff's objections and supplemental filings, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket Entry No. 104) is SET ASIDE. The Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 42) is REMANDED to Magistrate Judge Bryant to consider whether Plaintiff's supplemental proof, including authenticated medical records from Nashville General Hospital (Docket Entry No. 110-3 at 3-6) and verified letter from Nurse Birner (Docket Entry No. 110-3 at 10), can satisfy Plaintiff's burden to prove his mobility disability.

It is so ORDERED.

_________________________

WILLIAM J. HAYNES JR.

Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Cisneros v. Metro Transit Auth.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Dec 3, 2012
No. 3:11-cv-0896 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Cisneros v. Metro Transit Auth.

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN CISNEROS, Plaintiff, v. METRO TRANSIT AUTHORITY (MTA) et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Dec 3, 2012

Citations

No. 3:11-cv-0896 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 3, 2012)