From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cisneros v. Metro Transit Auth.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Apr 2, 2012
CASE NO. 3:11-0896 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 2, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:11-0896

04-02-2012

MARTIN CISNEROS, Plaintiff, v. METRO TRANSIT AUTHORITY (MTA) et al., Defendants.


JUDGE HAYNES


ORDER

Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 21) that Plaintiff's motion to add on individual, supervisor 54 to his action under the Americans with Disabilities Act be denied. Plaintiff now regrets his motion (Docket Entry No. 23).

Accordingly, after de novo review the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and the Plaintiff's motion to amend (Docket Entry No. 19) is DENIED.

Plaintiff's motion to add as a Defendant Davidson County Transit Organization (Docket Entry No. 23) is DENIED given that the proper party is before the Court that can provide complete relief.

It is so ORDERED.

__________

WILLIAM J. HAYNES, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Cisneros v. Metro Transit Auth.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Apr 2, 2012
CASE NO. 3:11-0896 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 2, 2012)
Case details for

Cisneros v. Metro Transit Auth.

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN CISNEROS, Plaintiff, v. METRO TRANSIT AUTHORITY (MTA) et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Apr 2, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 3:11-0896 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 2, 2012)