From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cisneros v. Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 28, 2013
3:13-cv-00033-LRH-VC[ (D. Nev. Jan. 28, 2013)

Opinion

3:13-cv-00033-LRH-VC[

01-28-2013

MAXIMILLIANO CISNEROS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN R. BAKER, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner Maximilliano Cisneros has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis and submitted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus and a motion for appointment of counsel. Based on the current information about petitioner's financial status, including any additional information he may have provided, the Court finds that he is able to pay the full fee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis without having to prepay the full filing fee (ECF No. 1) is DENIED. Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date this order is ENTERED in which to have the designated fee sent to the Clerk. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action. The Clerk is directed to RETAIN the petition and motion but not file them at this time.

___________

LARRY R. HICKS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Cisneros v. Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 28, 2013
3:13-cv-00033-LRH-VC[ (D. Nev. Jan. 28, 2013)
Case details for

Cisneros v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:MAXIMILLIANO CISNEROS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN R. BAKER, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 28, 2013

Citations

3:13-cv-00033-LRH-VC[ (D. Nev. Jan. 28, 2013)