From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CIS AIR CORP. v. EXPRESS ONE INTL. INC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 29, 2002
298 A.D.2d 317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2057N

October 29, 2002.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered September 20, 2001, which granted plaintiff's motion to strike the pleadings pursuant to CPLR 3126 and for imposition of sanctions pursuant to 22 NYCRR § 130-1.1 to the extent of sanctioning appellant law firm in the amount of $2500, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

ROBERT F. D'EMILIA, for plaintiff-respondent.

CAROLYN M. WALSH, for non-party appellant.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Buckley, Marlow, JJ.


Imposition of sanctions for discovery misfeasance is a matter best left to the trial court's discretion (see Anagnostaros v. 81st St. Residence Corp., 269 A.D.2d 150), and, bearing that in mind, we perceive no sufficient basis to disturb the exercise of discretion here at issue. We note in this connection that appellant's reliance on matters dehors the certified record on appeal is of no avail (see Knolls Cooperative Section No. 2 v. Evans Dev. Corp., 169 A.D.2d 690).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

CIS AIR CORP. v. EXPRESS ONE INTL. INC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 29, 2002
298 A.D.2d 317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

CIS AIR CORP. v. EXPRESS ONE INTL. INC

Case Details

Full title:CIS AIR CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 29, 2002

Citations

298 A.D.2d 317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
748 N.Y.S.2d 501

Citing Cases

Buchwald Assoc. v. Marber-Rich

Plaintiff repeatedly asserts that the trial court told plaintiff's counsel that the usual rules…