From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cirillo v. Davis

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 2, 1999
No. 98-0647 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jun. 2, 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-0647.

Opinion filed June 2, 1999.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Jack H. Cook, Judge; L.T. Case No. CL 94-8504 AJ.

Ronald M. Zakarin and Jennifer N. Lucy of Schwartz, Gold, Cohen, Zakarin Kotler, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellants.

Hinda Klein of Conroy, Simberg Ganon, P.A., Hollywood, for appellees.


ON MOTION FOR REHEARING


Appellants point out in their motion for rehearing that although they initially did not include the videotape in the record, they supplemented the record with that tape after they received the appellees' brief pointing out the deficiency. The tape shows a clearly visible and identifiable woman engaging in everyday activities such as walking, carrying a baby, bending over to pick things up, and getting in and out of a car. It does not change our opinion that the appellants have failed to show prejudicial error. We therefore deny the motion for rehearing.

GROSS, J., and BAILEY, JENNIFER D., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Cirillo v. Davis

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 2, 1999
No. 98-0647 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jun. 2, 1999)
Case details for

Cirillo v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:DAWN CIRILLO and DIMITRI CIRILLO, Appellants, v. JANICE DAVIS and IRION…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 2, 1999

Citations

No. 98-0647 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jun. 2, 1999)