From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ciralsky v. Tenet

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 20, 2011
459 F. App'x 262 (4th Cir. 2011)

Summary

dismissing Bivens claims asserted against multiple individuals "jointly and severally," because plaintiff failed "to point to any specific violations of clearly established constitutional rights, by any specific defendants"

Summary of this case from Joseph v. Maryland

Opinion

No. 10-2414

12-20-2011

ADAM J. CIRALSKY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GEORGE J. TENET, individually and in his capacity as Director of Central Intelligence; LOUIS JOSEPH FREEH, in his capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; ROBERT MCNAMARA, JR., individually and in his capacity as the General Counsel Central Intelligence Agency; JOHN DOE, individually and in his capacity as the Chief, Counterintelligence Center, CIA; EDWARD CURRAN, individually and in his capacity as Chief, Counterintelligence Group, CIA; JOHN LEWIS, individually and in his capacity as Assistant Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; RICHARD CALDER, individually and in his capacity as Deputy Director for Administration, CIA; DAWN EILENBERGER, individually and in her capacity as the Principal Deputy General Counsel, CIA; KATHLEEN MCGINN, individually and in her capacity as Complaints Attorney, Office of Equal Employment Opportunity, CIA, Defendants - Appellees, and CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Defendants.

Richard L. Swick, David H. Shapiro, Ellen K. Renaud, SWICK & SHAPIRO, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Neil H. MacBride, United States Attorney, R. Joseph Sher, Assistant United States Attorney, Douglas N. Letter, Dana Kaersvang, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00911-LMB-JFA) Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard L. Swick, David H. Shapiro, Ellen K. Renaud, SWICK & SHAPIRO, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Neil H. MacBride, United States Attorney, R. Joseph Sher, Assistant United States Attorney, Douglas N. Letter, Dana Kaersvang, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Adam J. Ciralsky appeals the district court's judgment dismissing his complaint alleging various causes of action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), for violations of his constitutional rights and violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (2006). All of Ciralsky's claims arise from the revocation of his security clearance and his subsequent termination from federal employment. The district court dismissed Ciralsky's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, for failure to state a claim, based on qualified immunity, and as barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we conclude that the district court did not err. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Ciralsky v. Tenet

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 20, 2011
459 F. App'x 262 (4th Cir. 2011)

dismissing Bivens claims asserted against multiple individuals "jointly and severally," because plaintiff failed "to point to any specific violations of clearly established constitutional rights, by any specific defendants"

Summary of this case from Joseph v. Maryland
Case details for

Ciralsky v. Tenet

Case Details

Full title:ADAM J. CIRALSKY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GEORGE J. TENET, individually…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 20, 2011

Citations

459 F. App'x 262 (4th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

Proctor v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

SeeJohnson v. Dore, No. RWT-12-3394, 2013 WL 5335626, at *4 (D. Md. Sept. 20, 2013) (granting Rule 12(b)(6)…

Joseph v. Maryland

See, e.g., Ciralsky v. C.I.A., 1:10CV911 LMB/JFA, 2010 WL 4724279, at *8 (E.D. Va. Nov. 15, 2010) aff'd sub…