From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cipolla v. Cipolla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 14, 1938
255 App. Div. 789 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Opinion

October 14, 1938.


Order granting defendant's motion to dismiss complaint under rule 107, subdivision 4, of the Rules of Civil Practice, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. In our opinion, the prohibition against the maintenance of two separate actions, pending between the same parties for the same cause, contained in rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, subdivision 4, contemplates two such actions in which the same relief is sought upon the same general theory, irrespective of whether or not each of such actions sets forth an independent cause of action. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cipolla v. Cipolla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 14, 1938
255 App. Div. 789 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)
Case details for

Cipolla v. Cipolla

Case Details

Full title:JAMES CIPOLLA, Appellant, v. JOAN DROSS CIPOLLA, Also Known as JEAN DROSS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 14, 1938

Citations

255 App. Div. 789 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Citing Cases

Rayex Corp. v. Sanchez

The averment of events which occurred subsequent to the service of the complaint in the first action and…

Bradford v. Brooklyn Trust Co.

( Keller v. Levy, 265 App. Div. 723.) In the circumstances the present action should be dismissed. ( Cipolla…