From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cimpritz v. Borden's Farm Products Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1933
240 App. Div. 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Opinion

July, 1933.


Order reversed on the law and the facts and appellant's motion to set aside the verdict and vacate the judgment and for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence granted, costs to abide the event. In our opinion, in the exercise of discretion and in the interest of justice, there should be a new trial and appellant given an opportunity to offer the newly-discovered evidence, which may reasonably be expected to change the result. We think the appellant has shown proper diligence in its preparation for the former trial of the action. Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cimpritz v. Borden's Farm Products Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1933
240 App. Div. 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for

Cimpritz v. Borden's Farm Products Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PHILIP CIMPRITZ, Respondent, v. BORDEN'S FARM PRODUCTS CO., INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1933

Citations

240 App. Div. 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Citing Cases

Matter of Marsh

The court has inherent power beyond a one-year period to relieve from such an order or judgment to avoid…