From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cihak v. Cihak

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Jan 23, 2019
Case No. 2D18-1767 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jan. 23, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 2D18-1767

01-23-2019

CHRISTOPHER C. CIHAK, Appellant, v. TAMMY M. CIHAK, Appellee.

Charles D. Radeline of Radeline Law Firm, PLC, Palm Harbor, for Appellant. No appearance for Appellee.


NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Chris M. LaBruzzo, Judge. Charles D. Radeline of Radeline Law Firm, PLC, Palm Harbor, for Appellant. No appearance for Appellee. PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. KHOUZAM, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Cihak v. Cihak

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Jan 23, 2019
Case No. 2D18-1767 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jan. 23, 2019)
Case details for

Cihak v. Cihak

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER C. CIHAK, Appellant, v. TAMMY M. CIHAK, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: Jan 23, 2019

Citations

Case No. 2D18-1767 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jan. 23, 2019)