From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ciechalski v. Tiffany Co., Employee Benefits Plan

United States District Court, N.D. California
May 23, 2007
No. C 06-2289 SBA (N.D. Cal. May. 23, 2007)

Opinion

No. C 06-2289 SBA.

May 23, 2007


ORDER


Defendant has filed an objection to Magistrate Judge Spero's April 30, 2007 Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 72-2, the Court sets the following briefing schedule:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT plaintiff shall file and serve his response to defendant's objection by no later than June 6, 2007.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT defendant shall file and serve its reply to plaintiff's response by no later than June 13, 2007.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Judge Spero's April 30, 2007 Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff's Motion to Compel is STAYED until such time as this Court issues a ruling on defendant's objection.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ciechalski v. Tiffany Co., Employee Benefits Plan

United States District Court, N.D. California
May 23, 2007
No. C 06-2289 SBA (N.D. Cal. May. 23, 2007)
Case details for

Ciechalski v. Tiffany Co., Employee Benefits Plan

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY CIECHALSKI, Plaintiff, v. TIFFANY CO., LTD. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: May 23, 2007

Citations

No. C 06-2289 SBA (N.D. Cal. May. 23, 2007)