Ciarcia v. Dager

Full title: Rafael CIARCIA and Adelina Sciarretta de Ciarcia, Appellants, v. Jorge…

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Apr 10, 2013

126 So. 3d 323 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. 3D12–2565.

2013-04-10

Rafael CIARCIA and Adelina Sciarretta de Ciarcia, Appellants, v. Jorge Añez DAGER and Maria Beatriz Folla de Añez, Appellees.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami–Dade County, Peter R. Lopez, Judge. Harper Meyer Perez Hagen O'Connor Albert & Dribin LLP, and Patrick J. O'Connor, Miami, for appellants. Billbrough & Marks, P.A., and Geoffrey B. Marks and Erin C. Hantman, Coral Gables, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami–Dade County, Peter R. Lopez, Judge.
Harper Meyer Perez Hagen O'Connor Albert & Dribin LLP, and Patrick J. O'Connor, Miami, for appellants. Billbrough & Marks, P.A., and Geoffrey B. Marks and Erin C. Hantman, Coral Gables, for appellees.
Before SUAREZ and LOGUE, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Aristo Mortg., LLC, 110 So.3d 99 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (“At the risk of viewing professional courtesy through rose-colored glasses, we can also recall a day when counsel appearing without opposition for a hearing on an obviously-contested matter ... would first place a telephone call to opposing counsel to confirm that some personal emergency or postal glitch had not occurred.”).