Opinion
CIVIL NO. 1:12-cv-330-DBH
03-04-2013
CIANBRO COMPANIES, PLAINTIFF v. MICHAEL UREMOVICH, ET AL., DEFENDANTS
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION
OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On January 28, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to counsel, her Recommended Decision on the defendants' motion to dismiss and Order denying the defendants' motion for oral argument. The defendants filed an objection to the Recommended Decision on February 6, 2013. I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The defendants’ motion to dismiss is DENIED as to Counts I through IV, but GRANTED as to Count V.
The defendants shall file a full response to the motion for preliminary injunction by March 11, 2013.
SO ORDERED.
_____________
D. BROCK HORNBY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE