From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chutick v. Pollock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 827 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Opinion

March, 1930.


Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The appellant may not be compelled to give particulars of its denials of the allegations of the complaint. The allegations contained in appellant's answer, claimed by respondent to constitute a defense, are only an amplification of the denials, are not asserted as a defense, and would not constitute a defense to plaintiff's cause of action. ( London Produce Co., Inc., v. Poels Brewster, Inc., 199 App. Div. 623; Vanderwerken v. Polachek, 206 id. 765.) Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Chutick v. Pollock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 827 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Case details for

Chutick v. Pollock

Case Details

Full title:MAX CHUTICK, Respondent, v. MORRIS POLLOCK and Others, Defendants, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1930

Citations

228 App. Div. 827 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)