From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chupko v. Reed

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1931
234 App. Div. 711 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

October, 1931.


Order as resettled modified by striking out the names of Bryant L. Hopkins and C.M. Seeley as persons subject to examination, upon the ground that neither is shown by the record to have been the operator or in control of the elevator in question, and that Seeley is in the employ of the defendant and is not "without the state" within the provisions of section 288 of the Civil Practice Act, and as so modified, affirmed without costs. Examination to proceed on five days' notice at the hour and place stated in the order. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Amd. by Laws of 1926, chap. 371. — [REP.


Summaries of

Chupko v. Reed

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1931
234 App. Div. 711 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

Chupko v. Reed

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET CHUPKO, as Administratrix, etc., of SAM CHUPKO, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1931

Citations

234 App. Div. 711 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)