From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chung v. Strategic Decisions Group

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Apr 23, 2009
Civil No. 08-1480-ST (D. Or. Apr. 23, 2009)

Opinion

Civil No. 08-1480-ST.

April 23, 2009


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Stewart has issued a Findings and Recommendation [23] in this action. The Magistrate Judge recommends granting defendant's Motion to Strike Declaration of Laura Chung [18] and granting defendant's Motion to Dismiss [6]. No objections were filed, and the case was referred to this court.

The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation of the Magistrate. Campbell v. United States Dist. Ct., 501 F.2d 196 (9th Cir. 1974).

No clear error appears on the face of the record. This court adopts the Findings and Recommendation in its entirety.

CONCLUSION

The Findings and Recommendation [23] is adopted and defendant's Motion to Strike Declaration of Laura Chung [18] and Motion to Dismiss [6] are granted. This case is dismissed without prejudice and with leave to replead.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Chung v. Strategic Decisions Group

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Apr 23, 2009
Civil No. 08-1480-ST (D. Or. Apr. 23, 2009)
Case details for

Chung v. Strategic Decisions Group

Case Details

Full title:LAURA CHUNG, Plaintiff, v. STRATEGIC DECISIONS GROUP, a foreign…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Apr 23, 2009

Citations

Civil No. 08-1480-ST (D. Or. Apr. 23, 2009)

Citing Cases

Penate v. Wyndham Worldwide Operations, Inc.

In general, submitting a declaration in support of a motion under Rule 12(b)(6) will trigger this rule.…

Durham v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am.

The Court also cannot consider the declarations submitted by Defendants in support of their Notice of Removal…