rejecting as insufficient a "memorandum omitting an essential term of a contract," and not allowing proof of the term by parol evidence
Summary of this case from Michael a Mentuck & Assocs., Inc. v. Lloyds Underwriting Syndicate #1209No. 00-P-1530.
July 12, 2002.
Judgment affirmed.
rejecting as insufficient a "memorandum omitting an essential term of a contract," and not allowing proof of the term by parol evidence
Summary of this case from Michael a Mentuck & Assocs., Inc. v. Lloyds Underwriting Syndicate #1209Full title:JEFFREY CHRISTO vs. RICHARD DRAPER
Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Date published: Jul 12, 2002
Moreover, the memorandum docs not contain any terms of the alleged agreement Mentuck seeks to enforce - an…
Donahue v. Heritage Property Inc., No"Nor can proof of an essential term that has been omitted from a written document be established by parol…