From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Christie v. State

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
May 28, 1929
122 So. 528 (Fla. 1929)

Opinion

Opinion filed May 28, 1929.

A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Orange County; Ira A. Hutchison, Judge.

Akerman Akerman and Palmer, Dickenson, Shurley Lake, for Plaintiff in Error;

Fred H. Davis, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell, Assistant, for the State.


Plaintiff in error was indicted and convicted for rape in the Circuit Court of Orange County. A judgment of life imprisonment was imposed and writ of error taken to this Court. A full statement of the case will be found in Christie v. State, 94 Fla. 469, 114 So. R. 450.

This Court is reluctant to reverse the finding of a jury when approved by the trial court but in this case the record has been carefully examined and the testimony is so contradictory in its terms and much of it so inconsistent with reason and out of harmony with the conduct of normal human beings we are impelled to the conclusion that in reaching its verdict the jury was influenced by considerations outside the record. The testimony of the alleged victim of the assault as to material facts in the former trial is also at variance with her testimony as to the same facts in the instant trial. A discussion of the assignments of error would serve no useful purpose. The judgment is reversed and a new trial awarded.

Reversed.

TERRELL, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, STRUM AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.

ELLIS AND BROWN, J. J., dissent.


Summaries of

Christie v. State

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
May 28, 1929
122 So. 528 (Fla. 1929)
Case details for

Christie v. State

Case Details

Full title:A. B. CHRISTIE, Plaintiff in Error, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Defendant in…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc

Date published: May 28, 1929

Citations

122 So. 528 (Fla. 1929)
122 So. 528

Citing Cases

Douglass v. State

This Court has repeatedly said that it was reluctant to reverse the findings of a jury when approved by the…