From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Christensen v. Christensen

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Aug 12, 2021
No. 1D20-1846 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 12, 2021)

Opinion

1D20-1846

08-12-2021

Mary Taylor Christensen, Former Wife, Appellant, v. Robert L. Christensen, Former Husband, and Advertising Services, Inc., Appellees.

Scott L. Terry of Florin Gray Bouzas Owens, Lutz, and Eric S. Haug of Eric S. Haug Law and Cons., PA, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Anthony C. Bisordi of Bisordi & Bisordi, P.A., Shalimar, for Appellee Robert L. Christensen. No appearance for Appellee Advertising Services, Inc.


Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County. John T. Brown, Judge.

Scott L. Terry of Florin Gray Bouzas Owens, Lutz, and Eric S. Haug of Eric S. Haug Law and Cons., PA, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Anthony C. Bisordi of Bisordi & Bisordi, P.A., Shalimar, for Appellee Robert L. Christensen.

No appearance for Appellee Advertising Services, Inc.

PER CURIAM.

Mary Christensen, the former wife, appeals the trial court's post-dissolution final judgment denying her motion for contempt and granting the former husband's petition for modification of alimony. Because the trial court correctly applied the law to the evidence and the former wife failed to show an abuse of the trial court's discretion, we affirm.

Affirmed.

B.L. Thomas, Roberts, and Long, JJ, concur.


Summaries of

Christensen v. Christensen

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Aug 12, 2021
No. 1D20-1846 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 12, 2021)
Case details for

Christensen v. Christensen

Case Details

Full title:Mary Taylor Christensen, Former Wife, Appellant, v. Robert L. Christensen…

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: Aug 12, 2021

Citations

No. 1D20-1846 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 12, 2021)