From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chowdhury v. Matos

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 10, 2014
118 A.D.3d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-06-10

Khalada CHOWDHURY, Plaintiff, Arime U. Mohammed, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Clemente MATOS Jr., et al., Defendants–Respondents.

Richard T. Lau & Associates, Jericho (Joseph G. Gallo of counsel), for appellant. Law Offices of Frank J. Laurino, Bethpage (Calvin Weintraub of counsel), for respondents.


Richard T. Lau & Associates, Jericho (Joseph G. Gallo of counsel), for appellant. Law Offices of Frank J. Laurino, Bethpage (Calvin Weintraub of counsel), for respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Julia I. Rodriguez, J.), entered June 28, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from, denied the motion of plaintiff Arime U. Mohammed for summary judgment dismissing the counterclaim against him, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted.

Dismissal of the counterclaim asserted against Mohammed is warranted in this action where Mohammed, while driving his vehicle in which plaintiff Chowdhury was a passenger, was stopped at a red light when his vehicle was struck from behind by a vehicle driven by defendant Collazo and owned by defendant Matos ( see Cabrera v. Rodriguez, 72 A.D.3d 553, 900 N.Y.S.2d 29 [1st Dept.2010];Francisco v. Schoepfer, 30 A.D.3d 275, 817 N.Y.S.2d 52 [1st Dept.2006] ). Contrary to defendants' contention that Mohammed's alleged abrupt stop raises an issue of comparative negligence, “an assertion that the lead vehicle ‘stopped suddenly’ is generally insufficient to rebut the presumption of negligence on the part of the offending vehicle” ( Francisco at 276, 817 N.Y.S.2d 52). Furthermore, even crediting the testimony of defendant Collazo that Mohammed abruptly stopped in the middle of the intersection and not for a red light, defendants have failed to proffer a nonnegligent explanation for the rear-end collision ( see Malone v. Morillo, 6 A.D.3d 324, 775 N.Y.S.2d 312 [1st Dept.2004] ). TOM, J.P., FRIEDMAN, RENWICK, GISCHE, CLARK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Chowdhury v. Matos

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 10, 2014
118 A.D.3d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Chowdhury v. Matos

Case Details

Full title:Khalada CHOWDHURY, Plaintiff, Arime U. Mohammed, Plaintiff–Appellant, v…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 10, 2014

Citations

118 A.D.3d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 4148
987 N.Y.S.2d 132

Citing Cases

Glauber v. C. Blackburn Inc.

The affidavit of Defendant Hernandez makes no mention of a vehicle stopping suddenly in his lane of travel…

Wilms v. Remy

den stop without more are insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact sufficient to defeat a motion for…