From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

I Mei Chou v. Welsh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 28, 2005
15 A.D.3d 622 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-06461.

February 28, 2005.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Polizzi, J.), dated June 20, 2002, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Before: Florio, J.P., Krausman, Crane, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Although the defendants made a prima facie showing of their entitlement to summary judgment ( see Toure v. Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345; Gaddy v. Eyler, 79 NY2d 955), the plaintiff submitted an affirmation from a physician stating that he examined a CT Scan of the plaintiff's lumbar spine and observed a fracture at the L3 level which he attributed to the subject automobile accident. This evidence was sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the plaintiff sustained a serious injury ( see Poma v. Ortiz, 2 AD3d 616; Smolyar v. Krongauz, 2 AD3d 518).


Summaries of

I Mei Chou v. Welsh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 28, 2005
15 A.D.3d 622 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

I Mei Chou v. Welsh

Case Details

Full title:I MEI CHOU, Respondent, v. LISA ANN WELSH et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 28, 2005

Citations

15 A.D.3d 622 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
791 N.Y.S.2d 579

Citing Cases

Uribe v. Jimenez

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendant's motion for summary judgment…

THOMAS v. ROBB

Thomas v. Robb The defendants made a prima facie showing of their entitlement to summary judgment ( see,…