From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bo Young Choi v. Sei Young Choi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 15, 1990
167 A.D.2d 217 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

November 15, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.).


In this divorce action commenced by plaintiff, the primary marital assets consisted of two dry-cleaning businesses. Both establishments were held in defendant's name alone. Pursuant to the parties' own arrangement during the marriage, defendant managed the 86th Street store and plaintiff managed the more profitable 23rd Street store. After commencement of this divorce action, defendant became increasingly abusive of plaintiff and threatened to deprive her of rights in the 23rd Street store. Plaintiff sought and obtained injunctive relief, based, in part, upon evidence of defendant's threats, and indications that defendant was attempting to sell the 23rd Street store, had fired or alienated employees, and had diminished the business's goodwill.

Under these circumstances, plaintiff made the requisite showing of entitlement to injunctive relief (see generally, Aetna Ins. Co. v. Capasso, 75 N.Y.2d 860, 862). The court correctly restrained defendant from transferring or disposing of the marital asset over which he retained exclusive control, or being present at the premises to disrupt or otherwise diminish its value. (Frankel v. Frankel, 150 A.D.2d 520.)

The court properly denied defendant's application to set aside and vacate the stipulation of settlement, which was entered at a time when defendant, represented by counsel, had actively participated in negotiations and acknowledged his understanding of its terms and conditions, as well as his consent. Moreover, he obtained a buyout of plaintiff's rights in the premises at a price of $5,000 less than his original offer. (See generally, Golfinopoulos v. Golfinopoulos, 144 A.D.2d 537, 538, lv. dismissed 74 N.Y.2d 793.) Stipulations of settlement are favored means of resolving disputes, which should not lightly be cast aside upon conclusory and unsupported allegations of duress. (Sanders v. Copley, 151 A.D.2d 350, 352.)

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Milonas, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

Bo Young Choi v. Sei Young Choi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 15, 1990
167 A.D.2d 217 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Bo Young Choi v. Sei Young Choi

Case Details

Full title:BO YOUNG CHOI, Respondent, v. SEI YOUNG CHOI, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 15, 1990

Citations

167 A.D.2d 217 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
561 N.Y.S.2d 724

Citing Cases

Price v. Price

Thus, some exploration of the nature of the testimony likely to be required from members of the Felder firm…

Loderhose v. Loderhose

However, this argument has been rendered academic by the wife's admission that the disclosure sought has…