From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CHOCTAW NATION v. ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RY

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Apr 8, 1968
396 F.2d 582 (10th Cir. 1968)

Opinion

No. 9573.

March 6, 1968. Rehearing Denied April 8, 1968.

Lon Kile, Hugo, Okla., for appellants.

Streeter v. Flynn, Oklahoma City, Okla. (Reuel W. Little, Madill, Okla., on the brief), for appellee.

Before PICKETT, LEWIS and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges.


This is a companion case to Choctaw Nation v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, 10 Cir., 396 F.2d 578. Reference is made to the decision in that case for the pertinent treaties and statutes.

The land in question is a 32-acre reservoir tract reserved from allotment because of an easement obtained for reservoir purposes by a predecessor of the appellee railway company in 1903. The complaint alleges an abandonment in 1910 and a conveyance to the Choctaw Nation and the Chickasaw Nation by the railroad in 1946. The answer and cross-claim of the appellees Lee F. White, O.R. Smiley, and Mamie Smiley, abutting landowners, allege abandoment in 1946. The railroad filed a disclaimer. The district court sustained a motion of the other appellees to dismiss.

In Choctaw Nation v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, supra, we held that upon abandonment of the reservoir easement, title vested to the abutting landowners. The same principle applies here whether the abandonment occurred in 1910 or 1946. The conveyance to the two Nations was a nullity because the railroad had nothing to convey.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

CHOCTAW NATION v. ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RY

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Apr 8, 1968
396 F.2d 582 (10th Cir. 1968)
Case details for

CHOCTAW NATION v. ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RY

Case Details

Full title:CHOCTAW NATION and Chickasaw Nation, Appellants, v. ST. LOUIS-SAN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

Date published: Apr 8, 1968

Citations

396 F.2d 582 (10th Cir. 1968)

Citing Cases

Willie v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

The issue is one of fact to be determined on the basis of all of the facts and circumstances in each case.…

Seminole Nation of Oklahoma v. United States

Seminole Nation cannot recover the land since Congress, in the same 1906 law, provided that in those…