From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chivers v. Bishoff

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Jan 23, 2024
1:23-cv-573 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 23, 2024)

Opinion

1:23-cv-573

01-23-2024

JAMES CHIVERS, Plaintiff, v. DERRICK BISHOFF, et al., Defendants.


Karen L. Litkovitz, Magistrate Judge.

ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 9)

MATTHEW W. McFARLAND, JUDGE.

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz (Doc. 9), to whom this case is referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations in its entirety.

Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES this action without prejudice for failing to pay the filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) that an appeal of this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore Plaintiff is denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Chivers v. Bishoff

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Jan 23, 2024
1:23-cv-573 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 23, 2024)
Case details for

Chivers v. Bishoff

Case Details

Full title:JAMES CHIVERS, Plaintiff, v. DERRICK BISHOFF, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio

Date published: Jan 23, 2024

Citations

1:23-cv-573 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 23, 2024)