From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chisholm v. Turner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jul 8, 2014
CASE NO. 5:13CV976 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 8, 2014)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:13CV976

07-08-2014

TREPEL CHISHOLM Petitioner, v. NEIL TURNER Warden, Respondant.


JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS


MEMORANDUM OF OPINION

AND ORDER

This matter came before the Court on Petitioner's petition for habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254. Doc. 1. This Court referred the matter to the Magistrate Judge. The Magistrate Judge submitted a report and recommendation recommending that the Court deny the petition. Doc. 24

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) provides that the parties may object to a report and recommendation within 14 days after service. Petitioner did not file any objections to the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court's limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984); Howard v. Sec'y of Health and Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).

Accordingly, the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted. The Petition for Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(A)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability.

IT IS SO ORDERED

John R. Adams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Chisholm v. Turner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jul 8, 2014
CASE NO. 5:13CV976 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 8, 2014)
Case details for

Chisholm v. Turner

Case Details

Full title:TREPEL CHISHOLM Petitioner, v. NEIL TURNER Warden, Respondant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 8, 2014

Citations

CASE NO. 5:13CV976 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 8, 2014)

Citing Cases

Turner v. Lazaroff

A claim that a conviction is against the manifest weight of the evidence is not cognizable in federal habeas…