From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chinsami v. Seabrooks

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 2, 2023
2:23-CV-0148-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-CV-0148-DMC-P

02-02-2023

SHU CHINSAMI, Plaintiff, v. SEABROOKS, Defendant.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. See ECF No. 2. Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is, therefore, granted.

The sufficiency of Plaintiff's complaint and service thereof will be addressed separately.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Chinsami v. Seabrooks

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 2, 2023
2:23-CV-0148-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2023)
Case details for

Chinsami v. Seabrooks

Case Details

Full title:SHU CHINSAMI, Plaintiff, v. SEABROOKS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 2, 2023

Citations

2:23-CV-0148-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2023)