From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chimbo v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 1995
214 A.D.2d 531 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

April 3, 1995

Appeal from the Court of Claims (Corbett, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Court of Claims correctly determined that the notice of intention to file a claim was defective because it failed to state the nature of the claim alleged, as required by Court of Claims Act § 11 (b). Since the notice of intention to file a claim was defective, the claimant could not properly avail himself of the two-year period in which to file a claim as provided by Court of Claims Act § 10 (3) (see, DeFilippis v State of New York, 157 A.D.2d 826; cf., Conley v State of New York, 123 A.D.2d 598). Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Thompson and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Chimbo v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 1995
214 A.D.2d 531 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Chimbo v. State

Case Details

Full title:MANUEL CHIMBO, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent. (Claim No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 3, 1995

Citations

214 A.D.2d 531 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
625 N.Y.S.2d 915

Citing Cases

Torres v. State

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. The Court of Claims correctly determined that the notice of…