From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Childs v. Verizon Wireless Managed Disability Benefits Plan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 21, 2013
CASE NO.: 2:12-CV-02981-GEB-DAD (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 2:12-CV-02981-GEB-DAD

02-21-2013

THOMAS E. CHILDS, Plaintiff, v. VERIZON WIRELESS MANAGED DISABILITY BENEFITS PLAN and METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants.


Hon. Garland E. Burrell, Jr.


[PROPOSED] ORDER ON SECOND

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME

FOR DEFENDANT METROPOLITAN

LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY AND

VERIZON WIRELESS MANAGED

DISABILITY BENEFITS PLAN TO

RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT


[PROPOSED] ORDER

Upon consideration of the Second Stipulation filed by Plaintiff Thomas E. Childs ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Verizon Wireless Managed Disability Benefits Plan ("Defendants") to extend the time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint AND FOR GOOD CAUSE APPEARING,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the parties' Stipulation shall be the Order of the Court, and that MetLife shall have up to and including March 1, 2013 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED.

_____________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Childs v. Verizon Wireless Managed Disability Benefits Plan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 21, 2013
CASE NO.: 2:12-CV-02981-GEB-DAD (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Childs v. Verizon Wireless Managed Disability Benefits Plan

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS E. CHILDS, Plaintiff, v. VERIZON WIRELESS MANAGED DISABILITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 21, 2013

Citations

CASE NO.: 2:12-CV-02981-GEB-DAD (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)