From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Childress v. Humphrey

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Sep 16, 1997
329 Ark. 504 (Ark. 1997)

Opinion

CR 97-1055

Opinion delivered September 16, 1997

1. APPEAL ERROR — MOTION FOR EXPEDITED APPEAL GRANTED. — The supreme court granted petitioner's motion for an expedited appeal to hear the issue presented in his mandamus petition. 2. APPEAL ERROR — CERTIORARI PROPER FOR REVIEW OF DETERMINATION ON BAIL — MANDAMUS PETITION TREATED AS CERTIORARI PETITION. — Certiorari is the proper remedy to review a circuit court's determination of the availability of bail; thus, the supreme court treated petitioner's mandamus petition as one for a writ of certiorari. 3. APPEAL ERROR — PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI GRANTED. — Noting that Article 2, section 8, of the Arkansas Constitution declares that "All persons shall, before conviction, be bailable by sufficient sureties, except for capital offenses, when the proof is evident or the presumption is great," the supreme court granted the petition for a writ of certiorari and directed the circuit judge to hold a hearing and to set a reasonable bond.

Motion for Expedited Appeal; granted.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari; granted.

Wallace Hamner, by: H.C. Martin, for petitioner. Winston Bryant, Att'y Gen., by: David R. Raupp, Sr. Asst. Att'y Gen., for respondent.


[1] The petitioner, Gregory Lamont Childress, filed a motion for an expedited appeal to hear the issue presented in his Petition for a Writ of Mandamus. The State does not contest this motion, and accordingly it is granted.

[2] The petitioner also filed a motion for a writ of mandamus asking us to compel Judge Marion A. Humphrey of the Pulaski County Circuit Court to set bail pending his trial on criminal charges. In Henley v. Taylor, 324 Ark. 114, 918 S.W.2d 713 (1996), we held that certiorari is the proper remedy to review a circuit court's determination of the availability of bail. Thus, we will treat Childress's petition for a writ of mandamus as a petition for a writ of certiorari.

[3] The Arkansas Constitution declares that "All persons shall, before conviction, be bailable by sufficient sureties, except for capital offenses, when the proof is evident or the presumption is great." Ark. Const., art. 2, § 8. Accordingly, we grant the Childress's petition for a writ of certiorari, and direct Judge Humphrey to hold a hearing and to set a reasonable bond.

Motion for Expedited Appeal granted.

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari granted.

CORBIN, J., would deny.


Summaries of

Childress v. Humphrey

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Sep 16, 1997
329 Ark. 504 (Ark. 1997)
Case details for

Childress v. Humphrey

Case Details

Full title:Gregory Lamont CHILDRESS v . The Honorable Marion HUMPHREY, Circuit Judge…

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Sep 16, 1997

Citations

329 Ark. 504 (Ark. 1997)
950 S.W.2d 220

Citing Cases

Friar v. Erwin

In his original petition, Friar only requested we issue a writ of mandamus. However, we have treated…

Arkansas Democrat-Gazette v. Zimmerman

Thus, we will treat the media's petition for mandamus as one for certiorari. See Childress v. Humphrey, 329…