Childress v. Crosby

Full title: EDWARD A. CHILDRESS, Petitioner, v. JAMES CROSBY, JR., Respondent

Court: United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Nov 10, 2005

Case No. 3:04cv243/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Nov. 10, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. 3:04cv243/RV/EMT.

November 10, 2005

ORDER

ROGER VINSON, Senior Judge

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated October 24, 2005. Petitioner has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and all objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 5) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED.