In Childers, a service member received a 4T in the Physical category of her PULHES report and was initially referred to the MEB for a hearing.
Summary of this case from Robinson v. United StatesNo. 08–7031.
2008-12-1
Gary Shane CHILDERS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.
Case below, 290 Fed.Appx. 253.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
In Childers, a service member received a 4T in the Physical category of her PULHES report and was initially referred to the MEB for a hearing.
Summary of this case from Robinson v. United StatesIn Childers, a service member received a 4T in the Physical category of her PULHES report and was initially referred to the MEB for a hearing.
Summary of this case from Robinson v. U.S.Full title:Gary Shane CHILDERS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.
Court:Supreme Court of the United States
Date published: Dec 1, 2008
In any event, while "a VA rating decision may be relevant to consideration of an appropriate disability…
Robinson v. U.S.A 4T designation does not necessarily entitle a service member to an MEB hearing. See Childers v. United…