From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chidiac v. Fustok

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 7, 1984
444 So. 2d 1122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 83-1075.

February 7, 1984.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; John A. Tanksley, Judge.

Kimbrell, Hamann, Jennings, Womack, Carlson Kniskern and Warren Hamann and Roy D. Wasson, Miami, Hansell Post, Atlanta, Ga., for appellant.

Frates, Bienstock Sheehe, Terry Bienstock and Lauri Waldman, Miami, Curtis, Mallett-Prevost, Colt Mosle, Herbert Stoller and Eliot Lauer, New York City, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.


Because the defendant and the subject matter of this litigation are in Florida, section 48.193, Florida Statutes (1981), is not implicated and the order appealed is, therefore, reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Chidiac v. Fustok

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 7, 1984
444 So. 2d 1122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Chidiac v. Fustok

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES C. CHIDIAC, APPELLANT, v. MAHMOUD MOHAMMED FUSTOK, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 7, 1984

Citations

444 So. 2d 1122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)